Moore v. United States

When conservative interest groups cheered Charles and Kathleen Moore’s suit against the government over a tax bill,1 they sought to “permanently put…to rest”2 progressive American lawmakers’ calls for a wealth tax.3 Instead, after the Supreme Court unexpectedly “changed the subject,”4 the justices reopened old wounds from the “most intense legal discourse” of an earlier era, […]

Tags:


DeVillier v. Texas

The law of constitutional remedies is tightly coupled with the law of equity. In the early twentieth century, suits in equity became the “normal mechanism” through which constitutional rights were protected against violation by government officials.1 From the 1950s to the 1970s, the structural injunction — which emerged as a tool to combat segregation — […]

Tags:


McElrath v. Georgia

The substantive law under which defendants are prosecuted can vary from state to state.1 But regardless of jurisdiction, there are procedural barriers against successive prosecutions.2 States like Georgia have created their own barriers to criminal proceedings by passing laws and amending their own constitutions.3 The federal barrier, contained in the Double Jeopardy Clause of the […]

Tags: